In reading his on Thursday (11), the minister, president of the first class of the Supreme Federal Court, highlighted the participation of the former president (PL) as leader and aimed to continue in power, “regardless of popular will.”
He accompanied the majority to condemn former President Jair Bolsonaro (PL) and the. Zanin’s vote was fourth and last after, and the rapporteur.
The minister made a predominantly reporting and technical vote, unlike his colleagues, who also resorted to political contextual analyzes.
Read below some of the minister’s main phrases.
‘DOCUMENT DUMP’
The minister countered the argument of the defense lawyers that there was a lot of files of files by without the time granted timely for analysis. Lawyers referred to the practice as “Document Dump” or “Data Dump” during the trial.
I remember, as a lawyer, to have worked with 80, 100 terabytes files, including without the availability by Link or any other means, but working within the Federal Police’s room, doing analysis. So, here, even, it was, in my view, to facilitate the work of the defenses from the referral of the full material in the form decided by the eminent rapporteur
Criminal organization, coup and Bolsonaro Leader
Zanin voted for the recognition of the existence of a criminal organization that had Jair Bolsonaro as a leader.
Everyone searched for him [Bolsonaro] to report, besides being the biggest beneficiary of the criminal organization
Possible indirectly Fux, which voted for Bolsonaro’s former joint of orders and acquittal for the crime of attempted abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, Zanin pointed out that the leader was the former president.
As Minister Alexandre de Moraes said, in all acts what was seen was the permanence in the power of Bolsonaro, not someone else, as his aide for orders [Mauro Cid] or any other member of the criminal organization presented by PGR
Proper liability and under the law of agents seeking institutional rupture is a fundamental element for social pacification and consolidation of the right democratic state
Difficult and indispensable to configure itself in the legal system, the coup of state needs to be provided, as done in Brazilian law, and, in case of proof, should generate the responsibility of those who committed or tried to practice it
The stability of the organization, and the very direction of actions before and after the 2022 elections, reveals the continuity of the project around the largest scope of the organization, which was the maintenance of a specific group in power, regardless of popular will
INSTABILITY
In his vote, Zanin said PGR was able to show that the purpose of attacks on institutions was to create political instability to justify decrees of exception and, after the election, try to testify the elected government.
The action of damage was scope to demonstrate a high degree of political instability to the point of justifying exception decrees
A permanent project of stroke of institutional relations, plus the purpose evidenced since the 2021 lives, of restriction of the free exercise of counter-amateur inspection of the Judiciary, with the scope of permanence in power. The following actions turned to this constant embarrassment of the judiciary, intensifying after the election to the scope of deposition of the elected government
January 8
The minister also evidenced Bolsonaro’s role in attacking the headquarters of the three powers on January 8, 2023.
There was a pronouncement, a process of formation and manipulation of popular feeling, a collective induction to the insurrection that cannot be ignored. There is no way to remove the obvious correlation between the narrative built by the group and constantly reiterated by its leader, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, and the agglutination of protesters who, stimulated by members of the group, later provoked the actions of 8 January
After the defeat in 2022
According to Zanin, PGR has shown that Bolsonaro’s led group started to develop more radical strategies to remain in power after the defeat to Lula (PT) in the 2022 election.
The group created even more severe contours after defeat at the polls. In order to stay in power, the group worked with the hypotheses of resorting to exceptional measures, either for the promotion of AutoGolpe, or by the subsequent deposition of the legitimately elected government
There was therefore a series of actions for the maintenance and reiterated stimulus of the permanence of campsantes of protesters in front of Brazilian Army barracks in various capitals
