PT deputies argued that the party executive closes in controversial votes to avoid wear and tear, in which to authorize investigation of parliamentarians in the (Federal Supreme Court).
When a party closes a question on a theme, it defines a position and can punish parliamentarians who vote different from this orientation.
The petistas complained that, at the meeting with the bench on Tuesday (16), the party president, made it clear what would be the PT’s guidance on PEC.
Therefore, parliamentarians felt comfortable voting according to their convictions. Some argued, for example, that the caption followed the center, in calculation that took into consideration that, in return, there could be support to defeat amnesty.
In other cases, particular interests would have heavy, as in the case of Deputy Odair Cunha (PT-MG), who wants to support future for one.
Although the PT advised against the amendment that rescued the secret vote, seven petistas were favorable to the measure: besides Odair, the parliamentarians Paulo Guedes (MG), Dilvanda Faro (PA), Jilmar Tatto (SP), Kiko Celeguim (SP), Valmir Assunção (BA) and João Daniel (SE). The vote of these last two caused surprise, as the panel found.
According to petistas heard by the column, the party should close a question on topics such as feather reduction, which can be voted to relieve convicts by the coup plot in the first class of the Supreme Court, including former President Jair Bolsonaro. The assessment is that a vote in this matter would be attacked by militancy.
It should also have a unified position in proposals that could testify against the history of the subtitle, argue.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
