Leaders of wanting to start, in the coming days, to the overthrow of. The decision would be a response to mobilization and on Sunday (21) against the text that protects parliamentarians from legal proceedings.
The proposal approved by last week should be voted by the Senate CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) on Wednesday (24)-a lean period of a week after the text arrived at home.
Senate cardinals claim that there are enough votes to reject the PEC both in the Commission (formed by 27 senators) and in the plenary, definitively burying the measure formulated by federal deputies.
The willingness to defeat PEC in the Plenary also represents a political gesture. Traditionally, projects that are the focus of internal divergence end up abandoned by parliamentarians and are not even placed. Voting the overthrow of a proposal would be a more emphatic message from the senators.
CCJ President Otto Alencar (PSD-BA), who is against the proposal, chose as rapporteur Senator Alessandro Vieira (MDB-SE), equally critical. Vieira will present an opinion suggesting to colleagues the rejection of the PEC.
The proposal has been since last week, but the size and speed of negative repercussions on social networks took parliamentarians and advisors.
Two House leaders claim, under reserve, that the Senate President, (-AP), was committed to discussing the PEC in the house. The mayor himself, (-PB), would have spoken of this settlement in a meeting with leaders last week, according to them.
Deputies complained on Monday (22) of an alleged breach according to the Senate, claiming that they were very exposed to criticism of public opinion, especially Motta. Alcolumbre interlocutors, in turn, deny the existence of this agreement.
An ally of the mayor classified the negative repercussion of the PEC as an “earthquake” and said that this caused the Senate to lose the conditions to take the issue further, as planned.
Sought, Alcolumbre’s press office did not respond.
After Sunday’s demonstrations, Senators who defend the PEC began to modulate the speech. The president of, Senator (PI), said he intends to suggest a “improvement” to limit the proposal to “crimes of opinion”.
“If the Senate decides simply vetoing the PEC of prerogatives, it is sovereign decision. Still, I will propose an improvement that can serve citizenship and strengthen prerogatives simultaneously,” he said through social networks.
Questioned about the suggestion, Alessandro Vieira told the Sheet who does not know “the criminal type of opinion”. “I will wait for the amendment protocol to know what it is about,” replied Vieira.
Otto Alencar stated that he respects Ciro’s position, but states that it is not possible to improve the PEC. The senator also stressed that there is a willingness among the senators to reject the idea of the House.
“I respect the opinion of Senator Ciro Nogueira, who is a friend, but this PEC can not even return to the House, absolutely, because they can replenish [trechos que forem descartados ou modificados]. What we should do is reject it. He bury it at the CCJ and the Federal Senate Plenary, “he said.
The PEC obliges the (Supreme Federal Court) to request prior license from Congress to criminally prosecute federal deputies and senators, a rule that existed from 1988 to 2001 and fell due to a broad scenario of impunity.
The measure is an ancient desire for much of the political world that publicly argues to need to defend itself with judicial coercion by ideological discourses and positions. Behind the scenes, the main fear is investigations by the suspicion of the application of billionaires parliamentary amendments.
Even if rejected by the CCJ, the proposal may follow three different paths in the Senate, depending on the commission’s outcome.
If it is declared unconstitutional by the rapporteur and rejected by the committee unanimously-which is unlikely-, the Senate President may dispense with the vote in the Plenary and file the proposal, burying it.
If the PEC is declared unconstitutional by the rapporteur and rejected by the CCJ, but not unanimously, parliamentarians may submit an appeal with nine signatures and ask for vote in the plenary.
Finally, the PEC can be interpreted as constitutional and rejected by the CCJ for other reasons, making room for voting in the plenary equally.
