The councilman filed a project of resolution that enables the return of, in the plenary sessions of the
The measure is quite controversial. Opposition councilors to the mayor () understand that that of law and resolution.
There are also councilors of the mayor’s base that are contrary to the return of the hybrid model. The face -to -face session is, for those who militate on social networks, the chance to produce videos and post cuts.
For the project, Thammy argues that the face -to -face model is mandatory only to deliberate on the prior opinion of the Municipal Court of Auditors, dismissal of the members of the Bureau and amendments to the Organic Law of the Municipality.
Today, online vote is an option only for projects that deal with commemorative dates, honors and street denominations.
Thammy says the digital format is just a complement and will allow all councilors to discuss and vote projects, even at a distance, for health problems, official commitments and emergencies in the operating communities.
He cites, as an example, that he would take at least one hour to move from the House to the Arpoador Garden in the west of the capital.
“Our city is giant, we have over 1,500 square kilometers, and I understand that one of the main functions of the councilman is the approach with people,” says the councilman.
“This measure can make us fulfill our bureaucratic function as well as social function of being with those who need it,” says Thammy.
The hybrid model, adopted in the pandemic, was only interrupted in March this year, amid negotiation for the house to approve the
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
