In terms of letter of intent, Federal Court included the best. The debut without excessive celebrations, with prestige to the choir of the house, lived up to the appeal to containment.
Words, gestures and scraps right at the necessary moment. Primacy to the collegiate, attention to legal certainty, a sense of duty to the detriment of the sense of power, disapproval of privileges, resistance to the temptation of the media spectacle, compliment to austerity – was everything there and more the phrase synthesis: “to law what is law, to politics what is politics.”
. It must be seen if he will have company and supports his purposes. Beginning within the court, extending doubt to the other powers.
After all, the Supreme did not assume the current protagonism just by self -warning. It was also cast for such a role by the lazy shortcomings of the executive and the legislature.
Will the Planalto Palace really be willing to give up the partnership, to invest in the organization itself and improve the articulation? And will Congress no longer help in the judiciary each time a political current feels impaired?
To these unlikely possibilities add to the remote hypothesis of more sprouted personalities with a seat in the court to adhere to restrained restraint and speech to the file.
The austere but cordial style of the new president is opposed to the combative profile of part of his peers, whose idea of defense of the Constitution is based on the individual ability to reaffirm precepts inscribed on which it would only be up to them, magistrates, decide, without the need to discuss them in public.
The general evaluation is that. It depends. It will have preached in the void, if the amounts defended by him do not meet the interests and vocations of those who preach standardization, but are created in the tab of current distortions.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
