The (Advocacy General of the Union) said this Wednesday (15) to the (Federal Supreme Court) that the agreement between the Three Powers to resolve the problems was satisfactory.
The government’s (PT) assessment is that Complementary Law 210/2024, which established new rules for the , removed unconstitutionalities from the process of indicating resources.
The AGU defends that the Supreme Court declares the constitutionality of the new flow on the —even maintaining the obligation for the government to execute part of the congressmen’s nomination resources.
The AGU’s statement was sent to the STF after, rapporteur of the actions on the amendments, gave a deadline for the parties to express their opinion on the merits of the processes. The minister is preparing the final judgment on the amendments case for this year.
The minister, the main candidate to take over the position in the Supreme Court, is the one who signs the AGU statement.
He highlights that the new rules imposed by the Supreme Court to guarantee the transparency and traceability of amendments forced the government and Congress to adopt new procedures for distributing resources.
Messias says that new information was made available on the Transparency Portal about the committee and rapporteur amendments with the indication of the parliamentarians responsible for allocating the resources.
He also highlights the obligation that Pix amendments can only be sent after “presentation and approval of work plans” and the joint action of several bodies to monitor the execution of resources.
“As can be seen, several positive deliveries around the theme of ‘impositive amendments’ were achieved through the coordinated action of the Legislative and Executive Powers, under the guidance of this Supreme Court, significantly reverberating in the points of insurgency brought up in these constitutional actions”, says Messias.
“All these initiatives, whether normative or administrative, have proven to be important for the construction of a harmonious path between the Powers with regard to parliamentary amendments, which is why they should not be disregarded, in any way, by this Honorable Court when judging the final merits of these constitutional actions”, he added.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
