“Forgive me if I ask too much.” Angels are already playing (and profiting) with the controversial Joana Marques

After all, the two brothers don’t seem to be that upset: they are already mocking the legal controversy, in a new advertising campaign with Frize.

After several months of feeling wronged due to the legal case against comedian Joana Marques, The Angels They have just transformed (apparently, with great joy) their sorrow into an advertising campaign.

Nelson and Sérgio Rosado are the protagonists of the new campaign Freezewhere the brothers transform the theme “Forgive” into what seems like a subtle apology for the compensation they asked for from the “Extremamente Nastável” comedian, worth .

In the ad, the brothers adapt the lyrics of one of their biggest hits to allude to the court case. “Forgive me if I ask too much. They were just legal measures”, they sing.

The brand takes advantage of the moment to promote the new Frize Botanical Mocktails, which are “only for those in a good mood”.

The campaign comes after Joana Marques also had controversial content, with the show “Em Sede Própria”.

The legal battle began with a humorous publication by Joana Marques, in 2022, about the performance of Anjos singing “A Portuguesa” at MotoGP, in Portimão. The comedian added images of a negative reaction from the jury on the program “Ídolos” to the original images and the satirical video infuriated the singing duo.

Nelson and Sérgio Rosado considered that the play went beyond the limits of humor and filed a public civil action, asking for more than a million euros for alleged pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, including loss of contracts, sponsorships and loss of image.

In this long and media-intensive process, figures such as Ricardo Araújo Pereira and Tatanka passed through the court, and Joana Marques defended that her intention was to create humor, and not to destroy the duo’s career. In October 2025, the judge found no causal link between the video and the losses alleged by the Anjos. The band announced that they would not appeal.

The case also generated news because of the legal costs: , and not the R$ 31 thousand initially advanced.