In a partial report on the sale of decisions at the (Superior Court of Justice), it states that no evidence has been identified so far regarding the participation of court ministers in the scheme.
Investigators indicted former STJ advisor Márcio Toledo Pinto and also, who is imprisoned at the Brasília Federal Penitentiary, on suspicion of crimes such as exploitation of prestige, criminal organization and, in the case of Pinto, violation of functional secrecy.
Andreson’s defense told the Sheet who would not comment on the case. The report did not locate the defense of the former STJ advisor.
“The analyzed dialogues do not allow us to infer that the investigated civil servants acted in collusion with ministers”, states an excerpt from the document.
“Similarly, there is no record of financial transactions or any asset transactions capable of indicating their participation or consent in the purchase and sale of judicial decisions”, says the report.
In the partial report, the PF asked the rapporteur of the case, minister, of the (Supreme Federal Court), to extend the investigation to carry out measures still pending.
Marcio Toledo, who worked in several court offices as a judicial technician, was fired in September last year.
The report was produced by a delegate who took over the case after the departure of the previous one, Marco Bomtempo, who left the investigation in October, citing physical and mental exhaustion due to stress.
So far, the Federal Police states that they have not found elements with signs of crime in relation to two former chiefs of staff under investigation: Daimler Campos (who worked for Minister Isabel Gallotti) and Rodrigo Falcão (for Minister Og Fernandes).
“The various steps taken throughout this investigation were fundamental in gathering evidence related to the processes indicated above, promoting the partial clarification of the facts and the improvement of the criminal hypotheses now outlined”, says the report.
“However, despite these advances, most of the judicial processes under suspicion still present important investigative gaps, the clarifications of which are essential for the correct and adequate conclusion of this investigation”, continues the PF.
“In this sense, it is observed that, at the current stage of the investigations, it has not yet been possible to clearly identify who the employees working in the offices that effectively participated in the criminal scheme are, nor how they acted, identify with greater precision the amounts improperly obtained and the way in which the bribe was delivered.”
