Technicians of the Ministry of Justice have praised the vote of the minister, the (Supreme Federal Court), in the judgment on the.
The point seen as the most positive is the responsibility of the platforms for the dissemination of illicit content such as pedophilia and violence against women. A folder representative defined Toffoli’s positioning as a “vote”.
The trial deals with the constitutionality of Article 19 of the Marco, which requires technology companies to remove content from the air with a court decision only.
He was suspended at the end of 2024 and should be resumed this semester.
Toffoli’s vote has been considered the hardest so far against the so -called “Big Techs”. He proposes the responsibility of companies that do not withdraw content even in the absence of court decision or notification, in a series of topics that include crimes against the rule of law, terrorism, racism, among others.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
Your signature can be further
Do you already know the advantages of being a subscriber of Folha? In addition to having access to reports and columns, you have exclusive newsletters (). You can also download our free app from or to receive alerts from the main news of the day. Your signature helps us do independent and quality journalism. Thanks!
Your signature is worth a lot
More than 180 reports and analyzes published every day. A team with over 200 columnists and bloggers. Professional journalism that supervises the government, conveys profitable and inspiring news, opposes the intolerance of social networks and traces a clear line between truth and lie. How much does it cost to help produce this content?
