Commentors SIC, José Eduardo Martins, Bernardo Ferrão, Ana Gomes and Martim Silva, analyze and evaluate the installments of Luís Montenegro (AD) and André Ventura (arrives) in the front-front of this night at SIC.
José Eduardo Martins
“André Ventura did not have the courage to tell Prime Minister 1/10 of the things he was telling him. When he was in front of him, he was not capable of this. This is fatal. He left his riding record to try to seem candidate for Prime Minister. Total blunder, because when the Clara de Sousa asks about health, we have the example of the pregnant woman, who later was not even true. To have started very well, said things that are definitive and were strong.
Bernardo Ferrão
“It is strange that spinumviva, after all that André Ventura has been saying in public about Luís Montenegro and relationships with this company, was not mentioned. I do not know if for fear, if I fear that it could have a backfire effect, or wanting to adopt a different posture than it usually has in these debates. Why did I think Luís Montenegro had a definite strategy? For this debate and managed to put it into practice: Touch André Ventura to a corner.
SIC News
Ana Gomes
“I gave Louis Montenegro 5 because I think he started well, in the line I had predicted, to try to dismantle André Ventura’s ‘charlatanice’. I think Ventura was completely buried by the lack of courage to try to face the Prime Minister and to tell him of what is a spin. which the prime minister said. It is one of the areas where the government did not fulfill the promises it had made and where the situation is worse than a year ago.
SIC News
Martim Silva
“I think Luís Montenegro bet today in what set him apart from the debate from a year ago-he is a prime minister today. What he shows is someone who occupies a place of state and says to his opponent: ‘I’m here. Someone can never sit here.’ brought by André Ventura. where Ventura explored more the fragility of Luís Montenegro was in health (…).
SIC News
