The Supreme Court (NS) of the Slovak Republic took Daniela Bombic, who is accused of extremist crime into custody. The reason is the fear of continuing crime. Tuesday’s decision is valid.
The prosecutor of the Department of Serious Crime of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Slovak Republic proposed custody of Daniel Bombic for failure to fulfill obligations, respectively. Violation of restrictions, which was previously imposed on the accused NS SR. The accused on Tuesday before 5 pm transferred from the premises of the court to the Institute for Custody in Bratislava.
The chairwoman of the Senate Dana Wänke said that the NS SR had already stated the reasons for custody in February, which was then replaced by the accused by the supervision of the probation and mediation officer and other obligations and restrictions. According to her, the court consistently analyzed each of the published contributions of the accused submitted by the prosecutor. “Posted posts with a hateful character,“She justified. She underlined that the court did not decide on guilt or punishment for the accused on Tuesday.
Police officers of the Criminal Police Department of the Regional Directorate of the Police Force in Bratislava detained the accused Daniel Bombic on Wednesday, April 16. The judge for the pre -trial proceedings of the Specialized Criminal Court (STS) filed a petition to take the accused into custody on Saturday, April 19, did not accept and released him from detention to freedom. On Tuesday, the complaint court annulled this decision on the basis of the prosecutor’s complaint.
Defender of the accused David Lindtner During his more than an hour’s statement at Tuesday’s public session, he reiterated that According to him, the case has a political-media-social dimension. Considers her to be artificially fed. “There is a gross violation of the right to presumption of innocence not only by opposition political officials, but also by the media,” he said.
In the past, three arrests were issued for Daniel Bombic. At the end of January he was escorted from Great Britain to Slovakia. The prosecutor filed a petition to take the accused into custody. Although the Judge for the pre -trial procedure of the STS stated in January the merits of the prosecution, but did not find the reasons for taking the accused into custody. Therefore, he released him from arrest to freedom.
At the beginning of February, the NS SR decided on the prosecutor’s complaint against this decision and although it found the reasons for the so -called. The preventive and escape custody, replaced by the accused, by imposing several obligations and restrictions, including the obligation to wear a monitoring bracelet. At that time, he was also banned from publishing contributions with a hateful nature on social networks and platforms.
In early April, Daniel Bombic filed a proposal to cancel the supervision of the probation and mediation officer. According to Lindtner, its subsequent detention was a reaction of the law enforcement authorities to filing this petition. The accused declared that since the February custody of the National Council of the Slovak Republic he has not used a single vulgarism for a particular person. He stressed that he never denied the Holocaust. The prosecutor submitted to the court at the beginning of Tuesday’s public session of the recording of the questioning of the accused of 25 April. He considers the accused’s contributions hateful and therefore proposed to be taken into custody.
