The minister, of the (Supreme Federal Court), said he did not believe that an articulation to relieve penalties of gain strength, arguing that the case stay with the judiciary, while the director general of, Andrei Rodrigues, said the punishments cannot be annulled by “political whim.”
The two participated on Monday (5) in Madrid of an event organized by the (Brazilian Bar Association). Among other topics, the seminar, which runs until Wednesday (7), addresses legal certainty and constitutional jurisdiction. Registration for the three days of meeting were sold at R $ 9,000, with more than 300 entries and presence of the Brazilian Justice Summit.
Gilmar said it is essential that the crime is “delivered to the courts.” THE Sheet The minister said he did not believe that an articulation to slow the penalties imposed on those involved in the episode gain strength, despite those invested in the legislature in a project that loosen the convictions.
“I think this crime is essential to be delivered to the courts. [Isto é] The eventual conviction or acquittal of those responsible for this whole episode. We took significant steps. Until recently, we failed that only the executors had been hit. Now we realize that the summit of this movement has also been reached, “he said.
In the dean’s evaluation, the advancement of investigations by the PF and the (Attorney General’s Office), when he arrived at the creators of the scammer acts, was a “relatively rare phenomenon in Brazil”. According to the minister, “we have been able to identify those responsible with robust evidence. So this is a positive data and we have to advance towards their liability.”
How it showed the Sheeta draft articulated by Senate President David Alcolumbre (Brazil-AP Union), to apply lower penalties to those who were present in the acts, but had no planning or financing role.
This is also the understanding of the PF Director-General, who said he was unaware of the content of negotiations to amnesty those involved. Andrei stated that the findings identified attempts at murder, as well as the attempt to abolish the rule of law.
“These are very serious situations that cannot simply be erased by political whim. My position, and is public, is contrary to the amnesty process, and people have to be responsible for the serious crimes they have committed,” said the director-general.
First speaker of the seminar, the Minister of Justice and Public Security and former STF minister, said he could not deal with the articulation by an amnesty because it is a topic that is under discussion in two other powers: the legislature and the judiciary. The head of the portfolio said, however, that “accompanies the evolution” of the matter.
Lewandowski added that he trusts the ability to resolve internal crises by the system itself. “I think there has never been such an auspicious period in 36 years in a theme of democracy. Of course there are internal crises, of course there are conflicts between the powers, but they are resolved by the system itself.”
Questioned by Sheet About the editorial of The Economist magazine, which points to concentration of power in the hand of judges in Brazil, particularly the STF minister, Lewandowski spoke in a cyclical protagonism movement of powers. “In a way, power is moving again to, which has the power of amendments, almost budget control,” he said.
