The government base is already preparing to contest a possible approval of what the federal deputy (PL-RJ) of Na (Federal Supreme Court) delivers, in the opinion that contradicts the Constitution.
The report is on the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) agenda of this Wednesday (7). According to members of the board, the opinion is expected to be approved.
PT leader in the House, the deputy (RJ) qualifies the opinion of clearly unconstitutional and states that if this understanding passes.
“We will first try to convince deputies of madness that this is. This is a new version of the amnesty. They are wanting,” he says. “Someone will provoke the Supreme, and the Supreme will declare unconstitutional. So the camera is better not to enter this adventure.”
Deputy Maria do Rosário (PT-RS) endorses Lindbergh’s understanding and states that the report is a disrespect for the CCJ itself. “Moreover, it extends the immunity that gives branch to the other defendants of the action, suspending the action itself. That is, an intervention in the Supreme Court. The House has no power to make this decision,” he argues.
The parliamentarian also states that party leaders and the mayor (Republicans-PB) have adopted “the best decision for democracy and for the country by removing such amnesty from the agenda.”
“This report resumes the same goal. They are using branch defense to rid the coup planning core. We can sensitize leaders and president to reject this maneuver,” he says.
Deputy Rubens Pereira Júnior (PT-MA) points out that the attempt will be unsuccessful, because the Supreme himself already has a summary that says that parliamentary immunity does not extend to the court without this prerogative.
For Deputy Orlando Silva (PCdoB-SP), the PL initiative creates an expectation of suspension of criminal action to stop the process and benefit other defendants. “This is not standing. It will serve to support narratives,” he says.
“The rapporteur may ignore, most may approve, but cannot be recognized by justice,” he adds. “It is an opinion to support anti-STF narrative. Judgment is in the Supreme Court and the Supreme cannot act illegally, as this opinion suggests.”
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
