Benjamin Netanyahu has been practically alone in his plan to conquer (what remains of) Gaza. , the operation obtained the Government Green Light That I so longed for. He is worth it, but abroad multiplies the pressure against Israhe for the operation to take the strip. Even inside, with numerous social protests in the streets of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other large Israeli cities.
In the last hours, the European Commission and EU members like Germany, Spain or Netherlandsthe Him, United KingdomTürkiye or Australia have verbalized their rejection. Not only with words in some cases, although More steps are expected forward Once the “total conquest” phase begins officially. Not like that of the USwhose position is limited in ‘letting’ his great ally; Everything else with some critical phrase of Donald Trump.
Criticisms this time begin by the cusp of the European Union, although with quite less forcefulness in his statements that many of his member states. The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyenhas asked Israel to “reconsider” the military plan, at a critical moment at the humanitarian level in the strip, where “a fire is already needed.”
For other governments it is not a simple word negative. The German Chancellor, Friedrich Merzhas announced that “in these circumstances,” Germany will decree the EMBARGO OF THE ARMED ISRAEL “That it could be used in the Gaza Strip.” In the bosom of the EU.
To that embargo has also joined Netherlandswhich has canceled its naval deliveries for the “risk of use” in Gazatí territory. For the Dutch Executive “Gaza belongs to the Palestinians”, so Netanyahu’s idea is a “wrong step” that “does not contribute at all” to relieve humanitarian tragedy, as Efe collects.
The Negative of Spain It is not news. In a constant internal controversy around the possible embargo of weapons to Tel Aviv, they have been multiple diplomatic clashes between governmentswithdrawal from the Israeli ambassador to Madrid included.
This Friday, José Manuel Albares He has “firmly” the plan “firmly. An operation that “would only cause more destruction and suffering” and that should be removed in pursuit of a true high humanitarian fire.
Even within the EU, in Belgium they have summoned the Israeli ambassador, Idit Rosenzweig-Abu, in an attempt to “go back in these intentions.”
Out of community Europe, the great actor is United Kingdomwho recently announced his intention of … if Israel not for war. In somewhat less hard terms than other countries, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, has branded “Erroneous” the decision to take gaza, urging Netanyahu to immediately reconsider “something that” will only cause more bloods. “
From the United Nations it has been the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türkwho has indicated that the alleged “total military occupation” of Israel would violate international law and go against the ruling of the International Court of Justicewhich forces to “end their occupation as soon as possible, as well as against the agreed solution of two states and the right of the Palestinian people to self -determination.”
Türkiye or Australia have joined multilateral rejection, demanding from United Nations Security Council a “binding resolution“To stop the occupation, in Ankara’s words.
