The Brazilian right approved a constitutional amendment project, which, in practice, prohibits arresting politicians.
No, it was not “the Congress” that approved. They were not “the politicians”. It was the right.
Yes, there was, but 80% of the petist deputies voted against. Adding all leftist parties, more than 70% of deputies voted against the ban on arresting politicians.
Among the center parties (, and citizenship), the proportion is much smaller: 30% of centrists voted against the shielding PEC.
Among the right -wing parties (new ,, PRD ,,), the contrast is obvious: only 6.7% of the deputies voted against the armor PEC.
More than 90% of the right voted to ban political arrest.
The numbers are these. Showing them is not having left bias. To pretend they do not exist is that it is having right bias.
All, absolutely all the deputies of the Bolsonaro party and its main followers, the PL, voted to ban politicians. One hundred percent. Everyone. No against.
The pocketist tried to argue that the PEC does not prohibit arrest parliamentarians: Congress is enough to take the opening of criminal investigations against them.
You read right. Remember the “against the system” pockets? They now argue that deputies are perfectly reliable to decide whether or not they can be investigated.
The deputy was one of the few directists who voted against the armage PEC. More specifically, 1 of the 4 among the 57 voting deputies of his party, União Brasil.
After the vote, Kataguiri recorded a video appearing discouragement that the politicians who had accompanied him in the fight against During Lava Jato enthusiastically supported the PEC of the armor.
Deputy, with all due respect, it is time to recognize the obvious: the Brazilian right was only against corruption while the accusations were against the. The deputies who voted for the impeachment that the Lord defended voted thinking about the accordance promised by Jucá and Temer. Although Lava Jato accumulated defeats after impeachment, the accord was definitely sacrament with Bolsonaro and Augusto Aras, when the secret budget spree was beginning. His right -wing colleagues voted in favor of the shielding PEC for fear of this robbery being investigated.
It was even remarkable to see the opposition vote for the armor and the government vote for ethics. In general, the one who fights corruption is the opposition: after all, who usually has access to money to steal is who is in government.
This seems to have changed with increased control of the budget over the past ten years. Now those who are in Congress can divert money without needing the President of the Republic.
The vote on the armor PEC also gives us an idea of what would have been a Bolsonaro dictatorship. If this is the kind of agreement that the scammers made in democracy, exposed to the criticism of public opinion, imagine how much they would have stolen in a dictatorship without free press or independent judiciary.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
