Rapporteur wants to vote amnesty, but pockets differ – 09/22/2025 – Power

While the deputy (Solidarity-SP), rapporteur of the amnesty project to the convicts of scammer acts, speaks of voting this week the text, which now, pockets reject the idea and deputies of the left say that impasses will eventually delay this schedule.

This is because, as it is being built by Paulinho with the support of the centrão and the mayor, (-PB), the project. The rapporteur has already stated that the broad, general and unrestricted amnesty that intends to be “impossible.”

In addition, the rapporteur stated, that the project must be agreed with the (Supreme Court), the government () and the, which must require time. This Monday (22) and Tuesday (23), the deputy will meet with benches of various parties in the House to sketch a text and then intend to take him to the other powers.

Bolsonarist deputies climbed the tone against the rapporteur and insist on an amnesty to the former president (PL), that is, forgiveness of the crimes for which.

“I did not give up my life in Brazil and risked everything to bring justice and freedom to my people in exchange for some unseemly and infamous agreement like what they are proposing. The broad, general and unrestricted amnesty is not under negotiation. […] There is no possibility of accepting the mere dosimetry of penalties in completely null and illegal cases, “he said (PL-SP) in X, who is in the United States claiming to be persecuted.

In the interview, Paulinho, who is, from the Supreme Court, said he will not make a project that affront the court, but that pacifies the country. Eduardo countered, saying that talking about pacification is cynical and calling the rapporteur “someone who was put by Moraes to bury the broad, general and unrestricted amnesty.”

How it showed the Sheetand avoiding criticizing it publicly, although they suspect the proximity between Paulinho and the STF. The alternative discussed on the bench is to present amendments or highlights to try, in the plenary vote, to include the amnesty in the text.

As it was clear that the rapporteur ruled out the amnesty and proposed only feather reduction, the reaction of the pockets intensified. Deputy Carlos Jordy (PL-RJ) said the party will not vote “this rascal.”

“Do you want to transform the PL of the PL of Dosimetry? They still say that this is in agreement with the Supreme not to bend it. This can only be a joke. Who is facing Congress is the ministers imposing that they do not accept amnesty, a prerogative exclusively ours. We will not accept anything other than broad, general and unrestricted. Amnesty, there will be no pacification, “he wrote in X.

PL President Valdemar Costa Neto also did not give up his amnesty, who in the Bolsonaro Bookstore Proposal even the ineligibility.

“We want Bolsonaro [livre]. That’s what the party wants. I think what the [presidente dos EUA Donald] Trump is waiting is the approval of the amnesty. Bolsonaro has to be a candidate, “he said.

In response to the dissatisfaction of Bolsonaro’s allies, Paulinho said he will not be able to please everyone. “Are you going to be shouting on one side and the other? Probably will. Not even Jesus Christ pleased everyone, so it won’t be me that I will. I will try. If I can’t, I need to please most,” he said in the interview.

“Those most radical people know this. Perhaps, even to make a speech to their class, the guy is radicalizing there, but he deep down knows that this possibility does not exist. As. It is best to have something in the middle, that can benefit those who were unjustly penalized,” he added.

On the other hand, leaders of governing parties, who are contrary to amnesty, also reject endorsement of penalties to convicted for crimes against the Democratic Rule of Law. This Sunday (21), the amnesty, the reduction of penalties and the shielding PEC.

The PT leader (PT) stated in networks that democracy “cannot be bargaining” and used the same argument of the pockets against the reduction of penalties – that this is a prerogative of the judiciary, which.

“We are against the reduction of penalties for the crimes of January 8. There is no negotiation between the powers, because the trial is still in progress, without res judicata, with possible resources to discuss dosimetry. […] The project hurts the separation of powers. […] It is an amnesty disguised, the result of deviation of purpose to benefit a specific group: Jair Bolsonaro and the military plot military, “he wrote.

source