If the minister manages to get his colleagues to agree to submit to one, he will have marked his time as president of the . It won’t be easy for you.
In the week that the minister, it was known that his colleague was going to watch the Libertadores final. He traveled on a businessman’s jet, in the company of lawyer Augusto de Arruda Botelho, descendant of the Baron of Pinhal, hired by Luiz Antonio Bull, Compliance director at Banco Master. Four days later, the minister issued a secrecy order on the process and determined that new investigations must first pass through his review.
the famous owner of Banco Master, had a weakness for events, including those he sponsored abroad, hosted by notables of the Republic. The jet that took Toffoli to the football game shows that the Master bank is gone, but its style survives.
A code of conduct for Supreme Court ministers would have the virtue of serving as an example for other magistrates, senior Executive officials and also for journalists.
This code would certainly take care of treats like the jet to Toffoli and two minefields: the lectures and the farofas on the Elizabeth Arden circuit.
No one can stop a magistrate from giving a lecture, even about Palmeiras’ misfortune. Everything would be clearer if the speaker posted on the internet how much he charged, where he spoke and who paid.
The same would apply to the farofas, including the origin of the transportation and accommodation paganini. This rule is strong and does not apply to the American Supreme Court. The brilliant minister Antonin Scalia died in 2016 during a farofa. If the Brazilian Court adopts it, it will get rid of a burden. It should be noted that a considerable number of magistrates operate within these limits. When he does one of his things, he stands out more for his conduct and gets exposure that is not given to the quality of his votes.
Access to ministers is valuable. When Minister of Justice, from 1937 to 1942, Francisco Campos found himself harassed by a criminal because he insisted on inviting him to lunch. One day he accepted, but sent his aide-de-camp.
The majority of Supreme Court ministers speak little, do not go on a rampage and select their speeches. How to select them? Just follow the lesson of Potter Stewart (1915 –1985), from the Supreme Court of:
“I don’t know how to define pornography, but when I see it, I recognize it.”
It would be healthy if the Supreme Court debated the shield itself together with a proposed code of conduct. The shield would show that only the Attorney General can open proceedings to impeach a minister. Bad game, but it would be the game played. The code of conduct would inform the distinguished public what shielded ministers undertake not to do.
From the smell of brilliantine, the armor will prosper, the code of conduct, who knows.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
