The return of retired professionals to public service is conditioned by legislation that requires specific authorization, a situation that has raised doubts and delayed television projects, as happens with Herman José on RTP. The issue gained visibility after statements by the comedian, who revealed that his program has not yet returned to the screen due to legal obstacles related to his pensioner status.
According to , there is a 2019 decree that allows pensioners to work in the public sector without penalties upon retirement, but only upon authorization based on exceptional public interest. This requirement obliges public entities to justify the hiring of retirees in a well-founded manner, creating an additional process that can delay decisions.
Program that was suspended
The case became public when Herman José explained why the new season of his program “Cá por Casa” has not yet progressed. “Pensioners need special authorization,” said the presenter, quoted by the same source. During his television appearance, the comedian reinforced that the problem is not related to the public station. “It’s not RTP’s fault. We have been in dialogue and it has been completely kind”, he said, as the newspaper writes.
Herman José described the legislation as something barely visible in the public debate, suggesting that many professionals are unaware of its existence. “There was actually a law that was hidden somewhere,” he said, adding that it limits the hiring of retirees in public companies.
Impact beyond an individual case
The presenter considers that the situation could affect several professionals with accumulated experience in the sector. According to the same source, he said that there are “immense talents” who could face similar difficulties. Despite the obstacles, Herman José remains interested in returning to work on the public channel. “There are people, like me, eager to get their hands dirty again,” he said, quoted by Correio da Manhã.
The presenter highlighted differences between the type of content produced on RTP and on private channels. “Only a public service channel can do the type of work that I do,” he explained, adding that these formats are not only evaluated by audiences. Meanwhile, he received proposals from other broadcasters, but chose not to move forward. According to the same source, he declined a recent invitation because he considered that private channels “live by looking at numbers”.
A question under analysis
The situation is being monitored by the responsible entities, who seek to find a solution to the impasse. “I know that the guardianship is trying to resolve the situation,” said the comedian.
The practical application of legislation continues to generate uncertainty, with a direct impact on the hiring of retired professionals. The case highlights how a legal rule can influence decisions in the public service and condition the return of well-known figures to television.
Also read:
