The former PT minister says that the minister of the (Supreme Federal Court) “dotted the i’s” and demonstrated that it is possible to defend the court and, at the same time, discuss a reform of the Judiciary.
“As we have to defend the Supreme Court against Bolsonarist and authoritarian attacks, it seemed that, by proposing the discussion of reforms, you would be opening a flank for attacks from the right. But the minister is this issue”, says Dirceu.
“Dino went to ‘concretely’. Shall we discuss? So here is a proposal, it goes from the letter A to the letter O. He has removed a veil. He is proposing a reform of Brazilian justice, not the Supreme Court”, he adds.
On this Monday (20), for the Judiciary. The list includes a review of the “constitutional powers of the STF and higher courts” and “rights, duties, remuneration, impediments, ethics and discipline of legal careers”.
Dirceu states that Dino’s initiative is in line with what he has said in the PT. For him, there is also no contradiction between the minister’s suggestions and Edson Fachin, who is trying to approve a code of conduct for the court.
In the article, Dino says that “Brazil needs more Justice, not less, as certain superficial discourses about supposed ‘self-restraint’ seem to intend” — the word self-restraint has been .
which must be approved at the party’s national congress this week, defends the reform of the Judiciary, including the . Dirceu is coordinator of the committee responsible for preparing the text.
The former minister says that the PT will not present “something ready” to society. According to him, after the congress, the coordination of Lula’s campaign (PT) intends to meet with the parties that will support the president to discuss the reforms that Brazil needs, including the Judiciary.
The former minister also rebuts the coordinator of the pre-campaign for president of Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ). Marinho criticized the convergence between Dino’s proposals and those of the PT and said that it was up to the Legislature to lead the process.
“What they need to say is what reform they propose, because up until now what they have tried to do is impeach Supreme Court ministers”, counters Dirceu.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
