Research shows that the majority of Brazilians view the agenda neutrally; US president and senator met at the White House on the 26th
A majority of Brazilian voters rate it as neutral the . According to a RealTime/BigData survey released this Monday (1st), 42% of those interviewed did not see the agenda in a positive or negative way.
Among the others consulted, there was a tie in the perception of the impact of the meeting:
- Neutral: 42%
- Positive: 29%
- Negative: 29%
Flávio Bolsonaro met with Trump on the 26th, at the White House. The former president’s son seeks American support in the presidential race.
The meeting took place at a time when the Flávio’s name drops in the polls of voting intention against President Lula (PT), after the publication of , on the website The Intercept Brasil.
Third way
The survey also measured the perception of names that could represent an alternative to the traditional poles of Brazilian politics. , followed by the former governor of Minas Gerais, Romeu Zema (Novo), with 21%.
The survey also asked the electorate about the current scenario of political division in the country. The majority of interviewees, corresponding to 48%stated that he was tired of the polarization between Lulism and Bolsonarism and declared that I would like to see a third way in the next elections.
Below Renan Santos and Zema, other names were mentioned as possible representatives of this alternative group:
- Ronaldo Caiado (PSD): 8%
- Flávio Bolsonaro (PL): 3%
- Aécio Neves (PSDB): 3%
- Joaquim Barbosa (DC): 3%
Others 12% of those interviewed responded that none of the names presented represents this alternative, while 18% They didn’t know or didn’t want to answer. Among those who still defend the polarized scenario, 27% stated that they believed in direct disputes as a way to defeat Lulismo, while 25% believe that polarization is the way to overcome Bolsonarism.
RealTime/Bigdata survey on who voters consider a third way in Brazil
2,000 interviews were carried out across the country, between March 29th and 30th. The margin of error is plus or minus two percentage points and the confidence level is 95%. The research is registered under protocol BR-05864/2026.
