The approval, by, against the deputy (PL-RJ) can pave the way for the locking of cases against other parliamentarians in the (Supreme Court).
The PL asked the House to also suspend the action against the deputy (-SP) for the alleged hacker invasion of the CNJ (National Council of Justice) system. The first class of the Supreme Court to ten years in prison and the loss of the parliamentary mandate. The argument is that there would be a persecution against parliamentarians by the judiciary.
Based on this, the possibility of requesting the process against the former Minister of Communications (-MA) was also mentioned, if confirmed the receipt of the complaint against him by the Supreme.
Juscelino was denounced by the PGR (Attorney General of the Republic) on the accusation of, which led to his fall of the Ministry of Government (PT).
The interlocutors has denied that there is the possibility that the party to ask the suspension. He says that a measure of the type does not fit right now, because he believes that the Supreme Court will not accept the complaint, and that it has not authorized conversations on the subject in its name.
In his case, unlike the lawsuit against Zambelli, the prosecution has not yet become a criminal action, when the Constitution provides that Congress may hold the progress of the process until the end of the mandate. The change in status only occurs if the complaint is accepted and the deputy becomes a defendant.
The mechanism was included in the 1988 Constitution, after the military dictatorship, to preserve the legislature’s prerogatives and to avoid judicial persecution to parliamentarians. Last week, he was first used in decades to suspend criminal action against a deputy.
The House even approved an even broader stoppage, which could benefit all defendants in the process against branch, including the former president (PL). They are accused of participating in the attempt of a coup d’état, which they deny.
After the vote by the House, the Supreme Court and paralyzed the criminal action against branch by only two of the five crimes on which he is accused. The rest of the lawsuit, including the accusations against Bolsonaro, will usually follow the rite in the judiciary.
The PL request for the House to suspend the criminal action against Zambelli was filed on April 29, before the vote on branch, but the president of the House, (-PB), has not yet dispatched the request for the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission).
Zambelli’s defense requested on Monday (12) that the trial against her in the Supreme Court was paralyzed until the House ruled on the PL request-which has no date to occur.
The defense’s appeal, however, was denied the same day by Minister Alexandre de Moraes, who highlighted only the suspension for alleged crimes committed after the diploma.
The accusation against Zambelli is for the Hacker invasion of the CNJ system in 2018, before the current term, to insert a fake arrest warrant against Moraes. The PL maintains that she exercised the mandate of federal deputy at the time and, therefore, would already be entitled to this prerogative.
The case presses Motta to make a decision on the PL request, which can start a new climb on tensions with the Supreme. But, like the Sheet He showed, leaders of center and left parties with the after -southern episode.
In a video published on social networks, licensed deputy Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP), who is living in the United States, raised the possibility of suspension of criminal action as a response from the House to the Supreme.
“If you want to send a message to the STF, the suspension of the case against Deputy Carla Zambelli could also be voted. Regardless of the merit, it would be a good message to put brakes on the STF, to ensure and use all parliamentary prerogative,” he said.
Motta said in an interview with the Valor Econômico newspaper published on Friday (9) that he expected the Supreme Court to maintain the decision of the House-which did not occur before one.
Nevertheless, Centrão leaders say, reservedly, that they do not see room for an answer without appearing a new chapter of crisis between the powers. They also evaluate that it is sufficient to lock part of the criminal action safeguarding only branch.
The tone is still cautious. A center leader said that if Motta is sensible, he will avoid the crisis climbing. But as he has conducted so far, he gives a breach to be widely charged by the opposition if he does not react.
Two other Centrão parliamentarians claim that it is premature to try to measure, at this time, if there would be enough votes to lock the action against Zambelli, but they consider such a decision to be unlikely because that would make the relationship with the Supreme Court even more shudder.
The first class of the majority formed last Friday to condemn the PL deputy. After the trial, there will still be appeal in the Supreme Court, and the penalties should only be applied after the final judgment (when no further appeals are possible).
In a statement, Zambelli’s defense stated that the Supreme Court disregarded arguments that would lead to the nullity of the process and surrounded the work of the defense. Your lawyers will appeal the decision.
The deputy said she is the victim of political persecution and that the vote of Moraes disregards the facts.
In March, the Supreme Court had already formed semi -open and the loss of mandate for illegal possession of firearms and illegal embarrassment with the use of a weapon. The trial was suspended due to a request for a view of Kassio.
