Bolsonarist deputies threaten the approval of the protection project of children and adolescents in the digital environment, pointing out that the text contains what they consider to be censorship of social networks. According to the PL leader, (RJ), the party may obstruct the vote, scheduled for Wednesday (20).
Already the president of, (-PB), argues that the plenary seizes the urgent request of 2628/2022, which was based on this Tuesday (19), and, the next day, take the merit. President’s allies minimize the criticism of the opposition, betting that the text will still have a majority.
Arriving for the meeting with party leaders on Tuesday, Motta said that obstructing the project “is a right of opposition”, but stressed that it is “an urgent agenda of Brazilian society”.
According to the schedule proposed by the president of the house, the vote of the project in the plenary would take place on Wednesday, shortly after a general commission, which will hear, from 9am, parliamentarians and experts on adultization.
The text, authored by Senator Alessandro Vieira (MDB-SE), has already been approved in the Senate and has the support of the Government (PT), who took advantage of the exhibition of the theme by YouTuber to try to advance other social networking regulatory projects-algo that pockets do not even want to hear.
Regarding the project, which gained appeal and was accelerated by Motta after complaints made by Felca, the pockets argue that there is a distinction between punishing online exploitation of minors and establishing rules for content on social networks.
The rapporteur of the bill, Deputy Jadyel Alencar (Republicans-PI), argues that it is not possible to separate the two.
“The problem is precisely how networks work today. The logic of engagement at any cost exposes children and adolescents to serious risks. Discussing solutions without reviewing this model would be innocuous,” he says.
Alencar, for whom polarization can contaminate the debate, says that the project does not deal with censorship or political regulation of content. “This is an agenda that should unite all sides.”
According to Sostenes, he stated Sheet Last week there was a discomfort with Motta’s position change, which at first announced that all projects on protection of children and adolescents would be gathered in a working group, which would have 30 to 60 days to develop a new joint text.
Now, the mayor says that the working group will be parallel and complementary to the discussion of PL 2628, which he decided to highlight and accelerate after an appeal of civil society entities.
“The left uses the Felca video opportunisticly. Platforms need mechanisms to prevent crimes against children and criminals, but we will not allow them to distort the scenario to implement the censorship of the networks with political objective,” said Deputy Carlos Jordy (PL-RJ) in X.
As revealed the Sheetthe final version of the Lula government’s Big Tech regulation bill uses criteria similar to those adopted by the (Federal Supreme Court) in a June decision that changed the.
PL 2628, in turn, requires platforms to prevent sexual exploitation, bullying and addiction, seeking to adapt the use by children.
After the pocket riot who paralyzed the plenary on the 5th, Motta bets on the adultization project to seek consensus and make the house’s agenda – a plane that can be disturbed by the inflamed discussion about network regulation.
After the riot, Motta sought to bury an agreement between Centrão’s pockets and parties, such as União Brasil and PP, to vote for agendas such as the end of the special forum and the strengthening of parliamentary prerogatives (ie, the armor of deputies regarding STF investigations).
The president of the house did not take these themes to the plenary last week, as the PL wanted. Instead, he began to announce other priorities, such as the adultization project.
Still, PL and Centrão leaders work in a proposal about the end of the forum and parliamentary prerogatives. For the pockets, the plan is to vote on these themes and thus make way for amnesty, which aims to deliver the former president (PL), who will be tried by the Supreme Court in September on charges of attempted coup.
In interviews last week, Motta stated that there is no mood in the house to vote amnesty, but admitted that the discussion of the forum and prerogatives may have greater adhesion among the deputies, given what called the discomfort with exaggerations of the judiciary.
