The rapporteur of the deputy (Solidarity-SP), said on Wednesday (24), that the text should be voted in the House plenary next Tuesday (30) and that if this does not happen, it is possible that the project that increases the exemption of income tax, also not voted.
The project that is government priority (), and petist deputies saw the rapporteur’s speech as a kind of blackmail, but ruled out to vote in favor of reducing penalties, which would benefit () and prisoners.
The mayor, (-PB), has already announced that the income tax project. Paulinho also stated that he will have a conversation on Wednesday, with Motta to define the voting calendar of his feature reduction project – that, for now,.
“I’m going to talk to Motta today to hit the vote calendar. But I think everything leads to believe that it is possible to vote next Tuesday. […] I even think that if you don’t vote for this, it won’t vote for IR, “Paulinho told the press alongside the PT leader, (RJ), after meeting the party bench to deal with the reduction of penalties.
After the meeting, the petista leader stated that the party did not change his mind – and the so -called dosimetry.
Then Paulinho left the interview to deal with the project with the PSDB bench. This week, the rapporteur to try to raise majority to reduce penalties. He has already been with the countertops of PL, MDB, Republicans, Solidarity, Avante and PT. União Brasil, PP and we can still expected this Wednesday.
Lindbergh then replied that any pressure on the PT will have no effect.
“There will be a clear movement to tell us that either we give in to the review of penalties or does not vote for income tax. But this meeting was very important. Because he [Paulinho] realized that the bench is unified [contra a redução]. So if anyone wants to put the themes together to somehow force the PT bench or the government to change positions, they won’t make it, “he said.
Hours later, Paulinho contemporated his speech and said that who defines the agenda is Motta. “If he wants to vote for the IR first, that’s fine.”
“I think the problem of IR is placed. I am a defender that I have to reduce the IR to the workers. I will vote in favor, I will work in favor, but I have a greater problem, that a problem of Brazil. We need to vote this matter,” he said about the reduction of penalties.
Lindbergh, in turn, stressed that income tax will be voted on next week. “If President Hugo Motta really wants to vote for this exemption, he cannot guide this theme [redução de penas]. It would be great confusion in this parliament. “
Behind the scenes, PT deputies stated that the blackmail of Paulinho should have no effect and was recorded by the press. In their opinion, it is worth paying to see if there will be retaliation in a project of interest to the people, such as the exemption of IR.
Lindbergh also stated that, if Motta would reduce penalties for next week, he runs that Paulinho’s project will be overthrown in the plenary and, in place, that the petista claims to be unconstitutional.
“So, who is guided, and is the president who guided that, is risking climbing again in a,” he said.
The deputy says that after the Senate and the application of the magnitisky law against the minister’s wife, “only has one way to President Hugo Motta: not guide.” “The again,” he amended.
For the PT leader, an eventual amnesty or feather -reducing vote next week would “rise” the guidelines of interest to the population and place Congress in “Shock with the Streets”. “Parliament will be wrong again,” he added.
At the meeting with the petista bench, Paulinho. “Honestly, after such a judgment, it would be a shame for the country [o fato de] Bolsonaro is not arrested and staying at home in a luxury mansion, “said Lindbergh.
Despite Paulinho’s pressure, the rapporteur and the petistas left the meeting in a friendly climate. PT deputies pulled a “amnesty” chorus and were rebuked, laughing, by Lindbergh.
The PT leader said he was always open, even though the rapporteur did not get any vows on his bench. “At least here no one has video recording, had an polite meeting,” he said.
