The consequences of the Mandelson case have provoked an unusual consensus in the british opposition. All parties, except Labor Partyhave supported a motion of the Conservative Party so that the prime minister, Keir Starmerundergoes a investigation of the Privileges Committee of the House of Commons for lie allegedly at parliamentary headquarters about the appointment process of the former minister Peter Mandelson as ambassador in Washington. The proposal of the tories added more pressure on Starmeralthough it has hardly any chance of prospering due to the refusal of the vast majority of the Labor bench to give it its support.
The opposition believes that the prime minister lied when he said that Mandelson had successfully passed the selection processes to be appointed ambassador at the end of 2024. Claims that, as it became known later, turned out to be false. Mandelson, linked to the pedophile Jeffrey Epsteindid not pass the selection process, but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs decided disobey the recommendation of officials and gave the green light to his appointment despite the doubts that already existed at that time. The big question is whether Starmer knew about the Foreign Affairs decision and deliberately lied or whether this decision was made without his consent.
Pressure on Labor
The prime minister has insisted that, if he had known of Mandelson’s links to Epstein, he would never have appointed him ambassador. Some explanations that have not convinced the opposition leader, Kemi Badenochwho has urged Labor MPs to join the motion to avoid lose credibility before his voters. “When they were elected, they promised their voters integrity and high standards. I am sure that, at the time, most of you meant it,” she said in her speech in the House of Commons. “It is not about the Labor Party, but about Prime Minister held accountable not only before the opposition, but also before yourselves and your voters.
The Conservatives have tried to give Starmer his own medicine, resorting to the same strategy he used in 2022, when he led the opposition. The Labor leader then pushed a motion for the then Prime Minister, Boris Johnsonwas subjected to an investigation by the Privileges Committee for lying to Parliament about the scandal of the Partygate. Johnson ended up resigning from his position before the outcome of the investigation was known, but the deliberation in 2023 forced him to leave your seat in the House of Commons and to retire permanently from active politics.
Some Labor MPs have assured that Starmer should submit to the scrutiny of the Privileges committee to lead by examplebut the Labor leader has ordered his people to vote against of the motion under the risk of being suspended from the party if they join the opposition.
Research underway
The failure of the proposal of the toriesHowever, it will by no means put an end to the scandal. The Foreign Affairs Commission of the British Parliament keep investigating the reasons that led to Mandelson’s appointment and what was the degree of responsibility of the people involved in this process, including Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeneywho resigned from his position in mid-February amid the crisis.
In a statement before the commission on Tuesday, McSweeney acknowledged that Mandelson’s appointment was “a big mistake” but he has assured that he defended his candidacy because he considered that the former minister – and former Trade Commissioner in Brussels – had the profile indicated for the position at a time when establishing good trade relations with the United States was a priority for the Labor Government after the Brexit. McSweeney has insisted that he defended the appointment with the “national interest” and not in his personal relationship with Mandelson, considered one of his great political mentors.
Starmer still has many fronts open. The possible unfavorable conclusions of the parliamentary investigations that are underway, as well as the publication of new confidential documents related to the appointment, could deal him a new blow and definitively put an end to the patience of Labor MPs, in whose hands lies the political future of the prime minister in the short term.
Subscribe to continue reading
