China reopens the doors to Brazilian meat, but tries to redesign the rules of the game

Rehabilitation of slaughterhouses brings relief to agriculture, while Beijing signals that it intends to depend less on Brazil

BRA08. RIO DE JANEIRO (BRAZIL), 03/17/2017.- Photograph of meat for sale today, Friday, March 17, 2017, in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). The Brazilian Federal Police today dismantled a gigantic criminal network, which involved several of the largest meat producers in the country and which bribed health prosecutors to be able to sell adulterated meat, not suitable for consumption and even expired, official sources reported. EFE/Marcelo Sayão
Brazilian meat in Rio de Janeiro – EFE

The reopening of Brazilian slaughterhouses to export beef to China represents an important breather for national agribusiness. After months of health restrictions and suspension of export units, Beijing once again authorized Brazilian plants, in a gesture interpreted by the sector as a sign of commercial rapprochement.

Today, Brazil maintains 66 slaughterhouses authorized to export beef to China, consolidating its position as the largest supplier of beef protein to the Chinese market. Brazilian relevance in this market is strategic: the quota granted to Brazil is more than double that allocated to Argentina, reinforcing the country’s weight within the global animal protein supply chain.

But the good news comes accompanied by a new challenge.

While easing health barriers, China tightens its trade policy to reduce dependence on imported protein and strengthen its domestic production. In practice, this is a strategic change with the potential to directly impact Brazil.

Since the beginning of this year, Beijing has operated a tariff quota system for imported beef. Within an annual limit estimated at 1.1 million tons, the import tariff remains at 12%. Once this ceiling is exceeded, the charge jumps to 55%, a percentage considered practically unfeasible to maintain the competitiveness of the Brazilian product.

The movement of exporters was immediate. Between January and April, Brazil accelerated shipments in a race to take advantage of the most advantageous tariff range before the quota was exhausted. Sector data points to growth of more than 50% in exported volume compared to the same period last year.

The logic is clear: guarantee a market before the door closes. And this is not an exclusively Brazilian problem. Australia, another major supplier of beef to China, is also moving diplomatically to expand quotas or renegotiate tariffs. The fear among exporters is that China is using trade policy as a tool for structural reorganization of its food supply.

With more than 1.4 billion inhabitants, food security is a strategic topic for Beijing. Excessive dependence on imports means geopolitical vulnerability. The Chinese move indicates a clear effort to increase self-sufficiency and reduce exposure to external suppliers.

At the same time, the commercial rapprochement between China and the United States adds an extra layer of unpredictability to the scenario, redistributing interests and repositioning global suppliers.

For Brazil, the health reopening is positive and preserves an essential market for the Brazilian trade balance. It is worth remembering that the restrictions imposed previously affected Brazilian slaughterhouses under health allegations, generating apprehension in the sector precisely because it involves the main destination for national beef.

Now the discussion can take on new developments. In recent days, American President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing has placed the United States back at the center of the dispute over the Chinese agricultural market, with announcements of new commitments to purchase American agricultural products and the resumption of trade negotiations between the two powers. In this context, Chinese signaling can be read not only as a gesture of normalization with Brazil, but as part of a broader strategy of diversifying suppliers and reducing external dependence.

*This text does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Jovem Pan.

source