Pre-candidate for the Government of , the former minister () stated this Wednesday (17) that the state governor, (), is wrong in criticizing the (PL-SP) by the (Supreme Federal Court).
“A person who went to the , placed Supreme Court ministers in a , harmed the São Paulo economy more than anyone else”, said the PT member in conversation with journalists after an event at PUC-SP, in the capital of São Paulo.
Tarcísio, who threw himself into the race for re-election in this year’s election, reacted to the conviction of the son of former president Jair Bolsonaro (PL) for the crime of coercion during the process, saying that the .
“He [Tarcísio] Not understanding that Eduardo’s stance harmed the State he governs, I think it’s a huge mistake. Eduardo needs to answer for his irresponsibility”, he continued. “It is classified as a crime. How are you going to disregard Brazilian legislation and not apply the penalty provided for by law? In my opinion, the governor of São Paulo sets a bad example by criticizing the justice system in this case”, declared Haddad.
Asked about the uncertainty regarding the vice-president for the October ticket, Haddad reported a meeting, the previous day, with the vice-president (), and said he hoped that the impasse would soon be resolved.
Haddad participated this Wednesday night in a debate on economic development and democracy alongside professors and researchers in the economic field. With , José Dirceu, former minister of the Civil House in government 1 and now a pre-candidate for federal deputy, also participated, but via videoconference.
In his presentation, the former Minister of Finance defended a historical thesis on the problem of Brazil’s economic development. For Haddad, in exchange for the abolition of slavery, in 1888, the Brazilian State was handed over to the farmers, with the Proclamation of the Republic, in 1889.
Thus, he says, the country created a ruling class, but not a ruling class that would distance itself from the particularism of its own interests and think about a national project.
“All the republican episodes of attempted coups that we have experienced throughout the 20th century so far have to do with the fact that this oligarchic pact, from 1889, is threatened by democracy. When democracy calls this pact into question and says: ‘No, we are going to have a national project’, you have institutional instability.”
