Article of the Regional Prosecutor of the Republic Ana Lúcia Amaral, from São Paulo, published in 2021 in the blog public interest under the title deals with relevant facts that may have reinforced the arguments to try to avoid the scammer plot.
In another text, the prosecutor states that the minister “launched, via ordinance, an inquiry to investigate fake news and disseminate messages that pay attention to the honor of court members.”
“He chose the minister for the task. In a typical measure of periods of exception, the judge who considers himself the target of criticism leads to police action and is the final judge of the case.”
Here are excerpts of the article:
“In 2019, what became known as the” end of the end of the world “was instituted, when, uncomfortable by articles published in the Crusoe electronic magazine, in 2018, which reported on atypical movements in accounts linked to the sponsies of ministers of the Supreme Court, and another, in April 2019, because it mentioned a document inserted in the judicial process with the expression” my father’s friend ” Tofolli, via Ordinance, launched an inquiry as if it were to investigate crimes committed on the premises of that court.
(…)
It has taken the air of something important: Inquiry against undemocratic acts! It was exalted by the Anti-Balancarinist press, as an act in defense of democracy and institutions! In short: a bunch of allopriers, who use social networks to curse ministers, were considered highly dangerous.
(…)
“It is difficult to convert critical crime even though rude to STF ministers who do not excel in coherent and well -grounded decisions, giving the impression that they decide to the liver or committed to the interests of those who guaranteed their appointment to the high position of STF minister.”
(…)
How long has the previous president of the Supreme Court left thousands of suspended criminal investigations, why did you require the defense of Senator Filho of the President of the Republic? And why is the complaint of MPE/RJ not examined against TJ/RJ decision, which gave special retroactive forum to the current Senator of the Republic for a crime of embezzlement, among others, committed when he was a state deputy?
Minister Gilmar Mendes, as a rapporteur of the complaint, seems to have a head to curse prosecutors and see the presidency of his colleague, Minister Fux.
Institutions work well for those who need slowness and connivance. “
Lawyer Becky S. Korich recalls, in her column in Sheetdecision of US Judge Frank Caprio, known as.
A mother arrives with her young son, for having no one to leave him. Caprio pulls he talks to the boy and names him “Assistant Judge”.
Ask if the boy wanted his mother to pay the whole fine, half or nothing.
The boy responds shyly, “Nothing.” Caprio gives the hammer confirming, “It’s determined, nothing!”
“The gesture of bringing the law back to the human is what separates a bureaucratic judge from a wise judge,” says Becky.
TJ-SP Judge José Luis Palma Bisson (1956-2014), remembered by retired prosecutor Airton Florentino de Barros, as well as Caprio, was a wise judge.
Bisson did justice to a poor boy, son of a cabinetmaker who died run over on his work on foot.
Free justice was denied to the boy because he had not proven that he was poor.
“How lucky your boy, after the unlucky of losing his father and was victimized by a hard -hearted son -without him, with the rejection of the gratuity you pursued.”
“[Coube a mim]son of cabinetmaker like you, the mission of reevaluating your fortune. ”
“You, a boy, in the pension of just one minimum wage, asks no more than to eat.”
“You deserve gratuity, because of poverty that, in your case, shouts to the full lungs for those who want and can hear.”
“It’s like a cabinetmaker vote.”
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
