Commentator José Eduardo Cardozo and the businessman and former federal deputy Alexis Fonteyne discussed, this Friday (19), in The Great Debate (Monday to Friday, at 11pm), if criticism can curb the advance of the armor PEC.
The proposal approved by the Chamber of Deputies. Among the changes provided for in the text is the establishment of the secret vote in the analysis of opening criminal proceedings against congressmen.
Cardozo understands that public opinion needs to be reached against the PEC.
“This PEC is an immorality. It is a shame you pure and simply create a process of processing, not allow parliamentarians to be processed, decide by secret vote. The voter does not know how he will vote for the one he elected,” he said.
“A parliament that had a secret budget, which simply has a lot of suspicions about some parliamentarians – not about all, because it is unfair – in relation to deviations from public funds from the amendments, now no longer wants to be process against them and the vote is secret to take people out of the process,” he continued.
Fonteyne estimates that criticism will brake the text.
“It’s called the Armage PEC, but it should be called PEC of the Narcotte, PEC of impunity, PEC of the CCP, because this is the right address for us to fill the congress with bandits, traffickers, thieves, all kinds, to get impunity,” he said.
“Why is such a PEC? Because the Supreme Court is not respecting the Constitution and then it wants to create a new layer to ask Congress for permission so that people and deputies are prosecuted. But the solution is much worse, because, especially with the secret vote, it will not proceed absolutely nothing,” he continued.
