Rapporteur of the House, the deputy (PP-BA) refused on Wednesday (24) to comment (Committee of Constitution and Justice) of the Senate.
“I don’t think anything [sobre a votação na CCJ]I don’t talk about this anymore, “said the parliamentarian when he was approached by Sheet in one of the chamber corridors.
Asked if you still see a chance that the measure was analyzed in the future, replied, “It was, died, killed death. Do you know this expression?”
On Wednesday, the CCJ of it unanimously rejected PEC and create a special forum for presidents of political parties.
There were 26 votes against the proposal, which became the target of strong popular pressure after being approved in the House last week, being one of the main motto of street demonstrations across the weekend.
The vote on the collegiate buries the proposal. The Senate’s summit considered it to take it to the plenary anyway, so that the set of senators also rejected it and the political weight of the decision was greater, but the idea bumped into the house’s internal regiment.
The PEC was managed by Centrão, a group of center right and right-wing that has a majority in Congress and had already tried to get the text previously.
The alleged reason was to protect parliamentarians from alleged abuses committed by (Federal Supreme Court). In practice, group exponents mainly fear the advance of investigations into suspected corruption involving billionaires parliamentary amendments.
In the House, PEC was approved by, in the first round, and by 344 to 133, in the second.
Staff was chosen by Centrão to report the text, but the measure was defended by the mayor, Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB), and behind the scenes, had as one of the main articulators the former president of House Arthur Lira (PP-AL).
It was in Lira’s office, for example, that the agreement was created with the Jair Bolsonaro PL to end parliamentarians riot performed on the return of the recess. For this understanding, the vote of the amnesty proposal to convicted of scammer acts and the shielding PEC, called by the PEC parliamentarians of prerogatives.
During the vote on the House armor PEC, Motta classified the measure as very important “to bring constitutional guarantees” to parliamentary mandates.
Staff said at the time there was no impunity. “Prerogatives are not privileges. It is the strengthening of institutions. The House is composed of members who have to have freedom of expression and vote without fear of external actions.”
He had also advocated the inclusion of forum to party presidents. “Political parties with Congress seat are activists in politics and complement political activity. The processes on them do not have to have authorization, but the forum is the same [ao dos congressistas]”He said before the vote.
