The (Attorney General’s Office) spoke out this Monday (23) in favor of the request filed by the defense of ().
The former president is arrested in the coup plot process, but he had to be on March 13 after feeling ill. He was diagnosed with bronchopneumonia.
“In the opinion of the Attorney General’s Office, the need for house arrest is confirmed, providing the necessary care for full-time monitoring of the health status of the former president, who is demonstrably subject to sudden and unpredictable harmful changes from one moment to the next”, wrote the attorney general, in the statement.
On Wednesday (18), the minister, asked the DF Star hospital, where Bolsonaro is hospitalized, for information about the former president’s clinical condition. The institution sent the minister medical reports and a complete medical record. After the PGR’s statement, the decision will be up to Moraes.
Bolsonaro is treating one resulting from an episode of bronchoaspiration. Although the hospital states that the condition is “good progressing”, there is still no forecast for discharge.
As shown by Sheethad the participation of and , the governor of , , the Bolsonarist bench in the and ministers of the STF.
An argument used by politicians and other ministers alongside Moraes was the risk that Bolsonaro’s eventual death would be seen politically as the responsibility of the Supreme Court.
At least half of the current composition of the court understands that letting Bolsonaro serve his sentence at home, through the application of other precautionary measures, is the best option.
When treating Bolsonaro on the morning he had his health crisis, the medical team on duty at Papudinha cited the former president as the reason for transferring him to the hospital.
When requesting Bolsonaro’s home stay, the defense stated that there was a worsening in his health condition and that Papudinha is incompatible with the preservation of the former president’s health and physical integrity.
The hospitalization was considered by the lawyers as a fact supervening on Moraes’ decision which, on March 2, . Therefore, a reconsideration was requested.
