A wing of the (Supreme Federal Court) had already assessed for weeks that the CPMI had gone beyond its limits and so was the way it sent messages to parliamentarians.
Court interlocutors state that the
Data on breaches of confidentiality by witnesses and those under investigation and the banker’s conversations became public in recent weeks and caused an uproar among the political class.
For STF ministers, the commission went beyond all limits.
Furthermore, there was still a fear that with the extension of the collegiate’s work, more leaks would occur. In an election year, something unacceptable, in the opinion of a member of the Supreme Court.
Therefore, some ministers considered that it was necessary to avoid creating a dangerous precedent.
There are those who say that the result that rejected extending the INSS CPMI has further isolated the minister, but the wing critical of the parliamentarians’ actions denies this and says that the judgment was a response to the legislature and not to the judiciary.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
your subscription could be worth even more
Do you already know the advantages of being a Folha subscriber? In addition to having access to reports and columns, you have exclusive newsletters (). You can also download our free app at or at to receive alerts for the day’s top news. Your subscription helps us provide independent, quality journalism. Thanks!
your subscription is worth a lot
More than 180 reports and analyzes published every day. A team with more than 200 columnists and bloggers. Professional journalism that monitors public authorities, conveys useful and inspiring news, counteracts the intolerance of social media and draws a clear line between truth and lies. How much does it cost to help produce this content?
