After the minister of the (Supreme Federal Court) presented a proposal to reform the Judiciary, his colleague defended a broader pact, between all Powers, for administrative and legislative changes.
The dean of the court defended Dino’s proposal and recognized that it is necessary to change the benefits currently granted to ministers and judges. He cited, for example, the decision that
But he stated that there are problems in several areas that require other reforms, and that it cannot be left to the Brazilian Judiciary alone.
“I defend a broader pact, drawn up by the President of the Republic and the National Congress. It’s all very confusing. When it gets tough, everyone runs to the Supreme Court,” he told the Panel.
In 2009, as president of the STF, Gilmar Mendes was one of the main organizers of the 2nd Republican Pact, with measures that sought to make the Justice system more agile.
stricter penalties for judges, prosecutors, lawyers and justice employees.
Court colleagues defended the minister’s proposal, but remember that there are other issues that are even more important and that need to be addressed. An example cited is regulatory agencies.
For Gilmar, the Master crisis exposed . Rules on the functioning of CPIs and changes to the Impeachment Law are also on the magistrates’ radar.
Internally, STF ministers defend that the president of the court, , call on the other Powers to a greater pact. , behind the scenes, for insisting on a code of conduct for court ministers.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
