The (Federal Supreme Court) may define rules, registration requirements and even the methodology for electoral polls this year. This is the assessment of ministers of the court and the (Superior Electoral Court) heard under reservation by the column.
The Supreme Court’s assessment is that the court has already given messages that it is responsible for monitoring the actions of higher courts and will not fail to decide on something that the TSE fails to do.
The case came to light after the preliminary decision by the president of the TSE, , to censor in response to a request from senator Flávio Bolsonaro ().
A STF minister states that a recent example of involvement in an electoral issue is the revocation of the mandate of the former governor of Rio de Janeiro (PL). After the TSE’s decision, the case ended up at the Supreme Court, which had to define whether the state
According to this member of the court, Castro’s trial opened the door for the STF to take a position in certain cases. A possible discussion about electoral research is an example.
The understanding is that, inevitably, the case may end up in the Supreme Court, even if the TSE decides on the merit of the research.
Among ministers, there is no fear, however, that Nunes Marques. But there is an assessment that he wanted to give messages to guide the performance of research institutes.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
