The PEC also disconnects attorneys who act on behalf of the monetary authority, but who are currently formally linked to the Federal Attorney General’s Office (). This generated dissatisfaction in the category.
The Central Bank’s public lawyers are divided regarding the body’s autonomy, but the vast majority defends remaining linked to the AGU.
They assess that there may be a “capture of legal matters by the manager” and that, as a result, they would lose institutional security and protection.
approved by the Constitution and Justice Commission of the Central Bank, which understands that monetary autonomy would require removing the prosecutor’s office linked to the AGU.
The prosecutors disagree and try to approve an amendment presented by senator Veneziano Vital do Rêgo (MDB-PB), which did not rule out the AGU’s actions. The rapporteur, however, rejected the amendment.
Despite disagreeing with the leadership of the Central Bank, the category says that there is a risk of transforming the PEC into an instrument of rupture between the BC and the constitutional system of the AGU, causing legal tension and uncertainty.
On the other hand, prosecutors defend another proposal. , can approve a project that includes BC prosecutors in the AGU Organic Law.
In this case, the proposal gives more powers to the minister, by allowing the head of the department to act on any matter of interest to them in justice.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
