The 2026 presidential race is beginning to take on unprecedented unpredictability in recent times. Unlike the 2018 and 2022 elections, marked by more defined axes over time, the next cycle must be guided by successive shocks capable of changing the course of the dispute in a matter of days.
The assessment was made by analysts in the Mapa de Risco program, a policy program for the InfoMoneyby pointing out a structural change in Brazilian electoral dynamics. “In 2026, every couple of days the main trend of the election changes,” said Creomar de Sousa, CEO of Dharma and professor at Fundação Dom Cabral.
In previous cycles, there was a kind of dominant axis that organized the debate. In 2018, rejection of the political system set the tone of the election. In 2022, the dispute was marked by a logic of review and containment of excesses perceived in the previous government.
For 2026, this predictability loses strength. The current scenario is one of fragmentation of themes and rapid replacement of agendas, which makes it difficult for candidates to build lasting narratives, analyzed Creomar.
The recent situation itself illustrates this dynamic. In just a few months, the public debate has moved between topics such as public security, institutional crises and, more recently, the economic impact of the rise in oil prices caused by international tensions.
External events gain weight
The influence of external factors should also be more determining. The escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, for example, is already directly impacting the price of oil and, consequently, inflation and the cost of living in Brazil, issues with strong electoral weight.
Continues after advertising
This type of shock tends to scramble the scenario and reduce the ability of both analysts and campaigns to anticipate. Instead of a linear dispute, what is emerging is a more reactive process, subject to rapid changes in direction.
According to the analyst, for candidates, volatility poses an additional challenge. Quickly adapt speech and strategy to an ever-changing environment. The need to respond to new facts can reduce the space for long-term planning and favor more tactical movements.
At the same time, the dynamic increases the weight of voter perception, who begins to react more intensely to recent events than to consolidated trends.
Uncertainty enters the price
From a market perspective, this scenario reinforces the difficulty of pricing political risk. The absence of a dominant axis and the frequency of shocks increase uncertainty about the electoral outcome and its economic impacts.
More than anticipating winners, investors start monitoring events and triggers capable of quickly changing the balance of the dispute.
In this environment, the 2026 election is likely to be less about structural trends and more about the ability to react to a sequence of events that are increasingly beyond the control of the candidates themselves.
Continues after advertising
O Risk Mappolicy program of the InfoMoneyairs every Friday, starting at 5am, on YouTube and your favorite podcast player.
