The US is also considering recovering the ‘military’: the last time it maintained compulsory military service was more than half a century ago, when it lost the Vietnam War

The US is also considering recovering the 'military': the last time it maintained compulsory military service was more than half a century ago, when it lost the Vietnam War

The US is once again looking askance at its military past. The country He has not recovered his military service, but he is closer to taking a step that many consider prior: the automatic registration of young people for a . The measure, included in the defense law approved by Congressproposes that men between 18 and 25 years old be registered without having to do the procedure on their own. And that was enough to reopen a debate which seemed closed since the end of the Vietnam War.

The key is in the Selective Service System (SSS)the organization that maintains the database of citizens who could be called up if the country activates mandatory military service. Until now, young people had to register manually within 30 days after turning 18. With the new model, That responsibility would pass directly to the State through the crossing of federal data.

What really changes with automatic registration

It does not imply that the US is going to reinstate the ‘military’ immediately. But it does modify an essential element: How the country prepares to activate it if necessary. In practice, registration is already required by law for most men in that age range. The difference is that now it would stop depending on the citizen.

According to the SSS itself, the objective is “streamline the process” and improve efficiency of the system. There is also an economic reason. Each year, the government spends millions of dollars on campaigns to remind young people to register. Democratic Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan, the sponsor of the measure, summed it up this way: “That means money spent on preparation and mobilization, rather than on educational and advertising campaigns“, in statements collected by Military Times.

The current situation helps to understand the decision. Although registration is mandatory, compliance has fallen to 81% in 2024, according to official data. That is to say, almost one in five young people is not in the database that the Government considered key in case of national emergency.

The consequences of not registering (although they hardly apply)

Failure to register is not a simple administrative oversight. On paper, it is a federal crime that can carry up to five years in prison. In practice, these convictions are almost non-existent. But there are more common consequences.

For example, losing access to federal study aidto certain public jobs or even to US citizenship in the case of immigrants. It is a system that has been operating for years, although with irregular compliance.

Additionally, many states already apply indirect automatic registration. They do this when issuing the driver’s license, which explains why the database remains relatively complete despite the failures of the current system.

Vietnam: the origin of all doubts

Every time recruiting is talked about in the US, the same memory appears: Vietnam. It was the last major conflict in which the country resorted to the ‘military’. More than 1.8 million Americans were recruitedin a war that ended up marking an entire generation.

He social rejection was growing over the years until it became a major political problem. The protests against the draft were massive and ended up influencing the decision to eliminate it. In 1973, the United States ended mandatory military service. and opted for a completely volunteer army.

Still, the record never completely disappeared. In 1980, President Jimmy Carter reactivated it as a preventive measure in the middle of the Cold War.. Since then, the system has continued to exist, although without being activated.

Fears of a possible return in a context of global tension

The legal change has come at a delicate time. International tensions, especially have fueled suspicion that the US may need to expand its military capabilities in the future.

The White House has tried to tone down those alarms. Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in an interview that recruitment “not part of current plan”although he added that the president keeps “all his options open.”

That nuance is what keeps the debate alive. Because, although automatic registration does not mean that the ‘military’ returns, it does make it clear that The US wants to have the mechanism ready to activate it quickly if the situation demands it.

More than half a century after Vietnam, the country has not taken the step of restoring mandatory military service. But he has not stopped preparing to do so either.

source