The Constitutional Court (TC) has admitted a resource of more Madrid in front of the veto of the PP of Isabel Díaz Ayuso to the regional assembly investigating, and debates, the different edges of the case that affects the president’s couple, Alberto González Amador, fiscal fraud crimes, documentary falsehood, corruption in business and unfair administration. The party considers the rights of its deputies violated because the appearance of the leader of the leader, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez (aka mar), was prevented, and that the Chamber would vote if it urged the Executive to dismiss him for reacting to the controversial threatening the journalists who investigated her (“”).
The formation of lefts also brought the veto to a veto to a commission of research on emergency hiring in the pandemic, since the Parliament would vote if it urged the government to audit the relationship between the community and, which is at the same time receiver of billions of the administration (with chirónsalud) and the main client of the company of the president of the president (with chiron -prevention). Although the providence of the TC, which was accessed by the country, only refers in its matter to the investigation commission, a source of more Madrid, and another legal, ensure that it accepts the appeal of the full party.
It is torn “. It is March 2024, and the representatives of the opposition at the Parliament table argue with those of the PP on the appearance of Rodríguez, and of charges of Quirón, as well as on the vote of a series of non -binding proposals that the conservative Health with private entities, reverse public-private collaboration, that the Government will be proven in the cases of corruption judicialized and related to health …). As Díaz Ayuso has an absolute majority, none of those initiatives moves ahead. Nor had the request for an Emergency Contract Research Commission in the COVID-19 crisis in a previous meeting of that same month. When the different reconsideration writings seen in meetings of the April and May table of last year either.
“In this legislature (…) there is a systematic inadmissibility of initiatives under a political opportunity exam, exceeding the competences entrusted to the table of the Madrid Assembly and that meet all the established regulatory requirements,” said more Madrid in its appeal, in which it accuses the PP of using partisan criteria to allow or reject proposals. “With this, the doctrine of the Constitutional Court is being generally and repeated,” said Bergerot’s party, which criticizes the lack of motivation of these decisions. “[La Mesa] He has carried out a material control that has exceeded the function that corresponds to the governing body in accordance with the applicable regulations, illegitimately restricting the rights that integrate the core of the parliamentary function of the recurring, ”he argued in the text.
Now, this says in this regard: “The section has examined the appeal for amparo and has agreed to admit it to process, appreciating that a special constitutional transcendence (art. 50.1 LOTC) is concurred in it (the matter raised transcends the specific case because it could have general political consequences.”
The High Court has become the main scenario of the clash between the regional and central administration, in addition to the PP of Madrid, and the opposition parties.
Battle in the Constitutional
Thus, the TC knocked an important part.
In addition, the high court still has to rule on a PSOE appeal against the first Omnibus law Approved by the Ayuso government, which modified in favor of the Executive Institutional Counterweight such as the Chamber of Accounts or the Transparency Council.
The socialists have also resorted to the reform of the norm regulating television and autonomous radio, and the, which occurred, in their opinion, when there were not enough deputies.
On the other hand, more Madrid sponsors three other amparo resources against the inadmissibility of questions and the lack of quorum In the vote of the Land Law, in addition to another for understanding that the rights of their deputies have not been respected by preventing them from asking for the president of the president, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, or by the Quirón health group, which is now admitted; or by reforming with an amendment a law to give the regional presidency veto capacity to any modification of the Royal Post Office (with the aim of avoiding the declaration of the headquarters of the Madrid Presidency as a place of democratic memory). The PSOE registered a similar resource and we can amparo for the ground.
Similarly, Ayuso announced. Most of that regulation has been, which will also have to rule on open conflicts around the State Amnesty Law, or the project to declare the headquarters of the Presidency of Madrid, in memory of the torture that were carried out there during the Franco dictatorship.
