Court performance is considered “good” or “great” by 16% of Brazilians, a variation of 4 pp up since December
Search Power shows that the work of the Ministers of the Federal Supreme Court is evaluated as “roomy” or “Bad” by 41% of respondents. Those who consider the performance of the court “regular” There are 30%, while 16% evaluate the Supreme as “bom” or “excellent”. The study was conducted from May 31 to June 2.
The rate of those who approve the work of the Supreme as “bom” or “excellent” Osciled 4 percentage points up in 5 months. In the same period, the negative rate oscillated 2 percentage points downward, at the end of the search margin of the search, of 2 percentage points.
The curves of the chart above indicate that there was a relief in the court assessment, which recorded the lowest approval rate in the round of December 14 to 16, 2024. At the time, the STF’s performance was considered “bom” or “excellent” for only 12% and “roomy” or “Bad” to 43%.
The research was conducted by Powergroup company Poder360 Journalism, with its own resources. The data were collected from May 31 to June 2, 2025, through calls for mobile phones and fixed phones. In all, 2,500 interviews were conducted in 218 municipalities distributed through the 27 units of the Federation. The margin of error is 2 percentage points. The confidence interval is 95%.
To reach 2,500 interviews that fill proportionally (as they appear in society) groups by sex, age, income, education and geographical location, the Power It makes tens of thousands of phone calls. Often there are more than 100,000 calls until respondents are faithful who are faithful to the whole of the population. Learn more about the reading methodology.
LULISTAS X BOLSAVERS
O Power Crossed the answers about the evaluation of the STF with the votes for president in 2022. As shown in the infographic below, the perception of the work of the ministers varies a little between the president’s electorate (PT) and that of the former chief executive (PL). The percentages are close to the results recorded in the total research stratum.
Power
The content of Power It can be read on social networks, where infographics and news are shared. Follow the profiles of the Power Research Division360 no, no, and no.
Research aggregator
O Poder360 It maintains a collection with thousands of surveys with known methodologies and on which it was possible to verify the origin of the information. There are studies conducted from the 2000 municipal elections. This is the largest and longest survey of electoral polls available on the Brazilian internet.
The database is interactive and allows you to track the evolution of each candidate. Access the research aggregator.
Research information began to be compiled by the journalist, director of writing Poder360on your website, in the year 2000. to access the old page with the surveys ,.
METHODOLOGY
The research Power It was held from May 31 to June 2, 2025. 2,500 people were interviewed 16 years old or more in 218 municipalities in the 27 Federation units. A parametric consideration was applied to compensate for disproportionality in the variables of sex, age, degree of instruction, region and income. The error margin is 2 percentage points, more or less.
The interviews were conducted by telephone (for fixed and mobile lines), through the URA (audible response unit) system, where the interviewee hears recorded questions and responds through the keyboard of the device. The study’s confidence interval is 95%.
To facilitate reading, the research results were rounded.
Because of this process, it is possible that the sum of any of the results is different from 100. Differences between total frequencies and percentages in variable cross tables may appear due to non -response occurrences. This study was conducted with its own resources from the Powerresearch company that is part of the media group Poder360 Journalism.
