After leaked audio confirming the affair with João Vicente, Gracyanne explains herself: “It was someone else”

apos-audio-vazado-confirmando-affair-com-joao-vicente,-gracyanne-se-justifica:-“era-outro”

spoke out on Thursday night (16/10) about the latest news involving . Exclusive information obtained by LeoDias portal indicated that the romance would be made official soon, and one had been widely publicized by the media.

However, in her new version, she clarified that she was referring to another João. She also stated that she is having fun with the supposed involvement with the “Vale Tudo” heartthrob: “That’s crazy… I’m laughing a lot, João and I. It has nothing to do with it. I know you’ve heard the audios out there, but it’s about someone else.”

See the photos


Gracyanne, who has been single since the end of her marriage to Belo, announced in April 2024, assured that she would make a possible romantic relationship public: “If there was something serious, I would talk about it, but there is nothing serious with anyone. I wasn’t even following everything that came out, I just now saw your messages.”

In her statement, the former participant reinforced her concern about: “It was scary, really desperate. Seeing someone you love with a gun pointed at their head is a terrible thing. My sister [Barbara]who was driving, became desperate.

“I couldn’t get out of the car quickly, and one of the robbers, with a gun to my head, was still pulling me back by my hair, and I was unable to lift my leg”, concluded the influencer, whose car was taken by the criminals. To the LeoDias portalshe confirmed that the stolen car is a Land Rover Defender, which could be worth around R$800,000.

According to exclusive information obtained by our report, the celebrities would officially announce their union in the coming days and had already known each other for a few months. It is worth mentioning that, in a conversation with reporter Monique Arruda, the former Tchakabum revealed João’s name offstage, behind the scenes of the interview. John, however, .