The White House is practicing “economic terrorism” – is that what JD Vance said?

“If the Iranians try economic terrorism… the US president has demonstrated: they can both play that game.”

JD Vance was in an interview at and, as expected, spoke about the subject at the time: a.

The peace negotiations in Pakistan: there was no peace agreement between the US and Iran. The US vice-president was there, in Islamabad, but refuses that “things went wrong”.

“It went well. We have made a lot of progress, we have left the terms on which the US is flexible. We had some good conversations. It was the first time that the US and Iranian Governments met in a meeting of this level, under the current Iranian leadership.”

“The big question from now on will be to see if Iran is flexible, if it accepts the critical points that we need to see for this to work,” he added.

And left some warnings. From the outset, he repeated that the Iran cannot – and never can – have nuclear weapons. There, there is no flexibility.

Looking at the economy, specifically the Strait of Hormuz, JD Vance accused Iran of practicing “economic terrorism” by “threatening any ship” that passes through the strait.

“If the Iranians attempt economic terrorismlet’s follow a simple principle: no Iranian ships will leave. We know this is important to them.”

And then he admitted: “As the president of the United States has demonstrated, they can both play this game.”

In other words: the vice president of the USA admitted that the Is the White House practicing economic terrorism?

“JD Vance ends up saying the truth out loud, without meaning to”, reads .

It’s just that your response sounded like you were admitting that Donald Trump is also an “economic terrorist”continues the portal.

This statement by JD Vance fits the “Kinsley’s Book”a definition created by journalist Michael Kinsley: it is “an error in which a politician inadvertently says something true”.