The minister (institutional relations) said on Tuesday (15) that () is commanding a conspiracy against Brazil through the articulations made by him and his family around the 50% surcharge announced by the president of ,.
For her, the former president’s movement is related to the fear of being sentenced to prison. She said this after the PGR (Attorney General of the Union), in her final allegations to the Supreme Court, reiterated Bolsonaro’s.
“It is the fear of condemnation for his crimes that explains the conspiracy against Brazil he commands today, articulating sanctions from the US government to coerce the STF, at the expense of the economy and jobs in our country,” wrote the government’s political coordinator in her X (former Twitter) account.
“He knows that, in the course of due process, his conviction for five crimes against democracy and the rule of law is practically inevitable, as PGR. Based on evidence, full documentation produced by scammers, testimonies and expertise, the final allegations dismantle defense fallacies and point directly to the commander of the coup,” he said.
In addition to Bolsonaro, the PGR called for the conviction of seven other defendants from the central core of the coup plot. The position is in the final allegations of the prosecution in the case, delivered by Paulo Gonet to Minister Alexandre de Moraes.
“The criminal action in the Supreme Court is moving towards the trial, in a firm demonstration that Brazil repudiates blows against the democratic regime, which it was costing so much. And it also repudiates blackmail and threats against the sovereignty of the country and our institutions, come from where they come, under any form or pretext,” adds Gleisi.
The expectation in the Supreme is that the process on the attempted coup d’état.
The former president has already been convicted by the TSE for attacks and lies about the electoral system and is. Today is ineligible at least until 2030.
If convicted of crimes of armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against public assets and deterioration of listed heritage, a.
