Last Wednesday (3), the phase of support of the defenses in the trial of the coup plan came to an end. Despite similar ways, the arguments revealed different strategies among the defendants of core 1. CNN Prime Time.
According to the analyzes, the highlight was the attempt to defend former Defense Minister Paulo Sérgio Nogueira to distance his image from the other accused. Lawyer Andrew Farias adopted an approach that seeks to highlight Paulo Sérgio’s differentiated position in relation to the other defendants.
Caio points out that, before taking over the Ministry of Defense, the former minister had a stronger connection with the Army’s high command than with the political articulations of the period.
Paulo Sérgio maintained more proximity to the so -called “legalist generals”, a group that includes military personnel such as O, and the STM (Superior Military Court) Minister, General Guido Amin Naves, who would have contributed to contain the scammer aspirations.
The analyst explains that this argumentative line seeks to establish a contrast between Sérgio’s profile and the others involved in the process, especially in the biographical context.
Despite this strategy of differentiation, Paulo Sérgio remains under scrutiny for his actions as the holder of the defense, during which he sent (Superior Electoral Court).
