Race, “apparent ethnicity” and accent are reason for detention in the US, Supreme Court

Race, “apparent ethnicity” and accent are reason for detention in the US, Supreme Court

Race, “apparent ethnicity” and accent are reason for detention in the US, Supreme Court

Conservative magistrate Brett Kavanaugh

Unlocked law that allows detention based on factors considered unconstitutional by political opposition. Hispanic accent, type of work or skin color may allow detention for interrogation in the US.

The Supreme Court of the United States authorized this Monday immigration agents to stop in Los Angeles suspected of being in the country indocmented, when suspending a temporary decision preventing detention based on racial prejudice or without reasonable cause.

With six votes in favor and three against, the highest US court instance was next to the government of Republican President Donald Trump, who appealed the decision of a federal judge who, in July, temporarily suspended the Rusas of immigration in Los Angeles simply with Based on people’s appearance, the language that speak or the work they do.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh said that the general order of suspension of immigration Rusgas was too far far by restricting the way immigration and customs agents (ICE) can take brief approaches to interrogation.

“To be clear, the apparent ethnicity alone cannot provide reasonable suspicion, however, according to the jurisprudence of this Court regarding immigration approaches, it may be a ‘relevant factor’ when considered along with other relevant elements,” Kavanaugh wrote, in accordance with the brief and unexplained order of the majority.

The conservative judge, appointed to the Federal Supreme Court by the first government of Trump (2017-2021), suggested that The approaches in which force is used can still face more legal resistance.

However, he stressed, federal law states that immigrant arrests based on a reasonable suspicion of illegal presence “They have been an important component of immigration law in the United States for decades,” covering several presidential governments.

Now immigration agents can then, according to the, can continue to decide anyone who stops and at least stopping briefly to interrogation, only based on one or a combination of four factors.

They are: the race or “apparent ethnicity” of the people; The fact that they speak English with accent or speak Spanish; their presence in specific places, such as farms or workers meeting points; and the work type they exercise.

In a striking disagreement, accompanied by his two liberal colleagues, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, of Porto-Rican origin, wrote: “Numerous people in the Los Angeles area were clinging to the ground and handcuffed simply because of their appearance, their accent and the fact that they earn life with manual work.

In the view of the three Supreme Judges who today voted against, the decision approved by the conservative majority reflects “a severe abuse “ emergency decisions.

The Supreme Court’s decision represents a significant victory for the White House, It drives its mass deportation policy and made Los Angeles one of its main targets, which could create a precedent for ICE operations in large US cities with a high concentration of immigrants.

The raw police in search of illegal migrants in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area triggered strong social rejection and even violent confrontations with agents, transforming the state of California into a symbol of resistance to the Trump administration.

Source link