The operation against the government leader in , (-BA), is a good opportunity to review the .
In my column of March 28, “”, I proposed to separate, in the graph, who was accused of stealing with the Master, of trying to save the Master and of receiving money from the Master. What else have we discovered since that day?
Jaques Wagner is accused of receiving money from Master through family members. Furthermore, the decision that authorized the operation mentions conversations that, if confirmed, should move the Bahian senator from the “received money” section to “tried to save the Master”.
In my PowerPoint from March 28th, the Bahia PT was already in the “stole with the Master” section due to suspicions involving CredCesta. It would be nice if you could help us replace the caption with the names of specific people.
On the right, the line to enter the PowerPoint is longer, and includes much larger fish.
The right-wing presidential candidate, (-RJ), now dominates the “he received money from the Master” field, but the question is whether he should migrate to “he stole from the Master”. After all, if it gave him millions, the Bolsonarian governors gave billions (much more than we knew on March 28) from retirees to the Master.
The same reasoning applies to the president of the Senate, (-AP), who Veja magazine accuses of receiving R$150 million from Master. Amapá’s pension plan, which put retirees’ money into Master, is controlled by its allies.
(-PB), president of , is the same: his family members received a friendly loan from Master. Motta is the author of a project that would force private pension entities to invest in the carbon stock market. If the money was given in exchange for the project, the deputy goes to the “stole from the Master” section. Vorcaro wanted this approval because he was inflating his investment portfolio with a sham venture in .
Filipe Barros (PL-PR) was on PowerPoint in “tried to save the Master” for having presented the bill that copied the “Master Amendment”, which (-PI), today we know, received promptly from Vorcaro. From what I already explained in the last column, alongside the deputy from Paraná.
Now draw the graph, color the right-wingers blue, the left-wingers red, the judges black, and tell me what you see. Change the criteria if you want: see which side made more money, which side has more people involved, how important those involved are to your own side.
The result will be the same. For every left-wing defendant named in investigations, four or five new right-wing defendants appear, increasingly powerful and moving more and more money. It’s no longer a question of knowing how many right-wing leaders are in Master’s PowerPoint, but which one isn’t.
I miss when we criticized the right, in a somewhat idiotic way, for only thinking about numbers, not people. Nowadays it is difficult to teach them how to count dots on a graph.
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
